Expert Comment On Iinet Decision

< BACK TO LEGAL starstarstarstarstar   People - Legal Press Release
4th February 2010, 02:34pm - Views: 1015





People Feature RMIT University 1 image

People Feature RMIT University 2 image

EXPERT

COMMENT


University

Communications


View RMIT media 

releases and 

find experts:

rmit.edu.au/newsroom







MELBOURNE

BRUNSWICK

BUNDOORA 

FISHERMANS BEND

POINT COOK

HAMILTON

  HO CHI MINH CITY

HANOI




Expert comment on iiNet decision


ISPs will be breathing a sigh of relief at the decision of Justice Cowdroy in the

Federal Court today that iiNet did not “authorise” copyright breach by its account

holders engaged in unlawful filesharing, according to RMIT University’s General

Counsel, John Lambrick.


The decision also found that iiNet was protected by the “safe harbour” provisions of

the Australian Copyright Act, which can prevent ISPs from being liable for

damages.


On the other hand, the decision would do nothing to stem the flow of unauthorised

filesharing across the internet, Mr Lambrick said. By some estimates, 50 to 80 per

cent of broadband traffic involves the unlawful transmission of copyright protected

content.


“Regardless of the legal reasoning behind the judgement, on balance the outcome

was appropriate on a policy basis. A decision in favour of the Australian Federation

Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) would have created very significant compliance

costs for the ISP industry, with ISPs required to take an unaccustomed policing

role in respect of the activities of their account holders,” Mr Lambrick said.


“Worse still, a decision against iiNet may have caused panic amongst some ISPs,

resulting in termination of accounts upon demand by content owners, sometimes

without justification.


“While AFACT is likely to appeal the decision all the way to the High Court, it is

likely that the Federal Government will intervene to legislate a solution. Any such

solution should facilitate downloader accountability, but at the same time protect

ISPs and other service providers from liability. 


“Such solutions may include a minimalist approach, whereby ISPs are simply

required to pass on details of account holders to content owners claiming a breach,

or the establishment of a regulatory body to oversee complaints lodged by content

owners.


“The decision will create worldwide interest in light of similar ‘safe harbour’

provisions which operate in the USA and Europe.”


Mr Lambrick is available for comment on this issue.


For interviews: RMIT University’s General Counsel, John Lambrick, (03) 9925

3522 or 0418 310 813.


For general media enquiries: RMIT University Communications, David Glanz,

(03) 9925 2807 or 0438 547 723.

4 February, 2010






news articles logo NEWS ARTICLES
Contact News Articles |Remove this article