School Of Hard Knocks Could Be Harming Kids

< BACK TO EDUCATION starstarstarstarstar   People - Education Press Release
19th January 2009, 03:03pm - Views: 693








University of Sydney Media Release


19 January 2009

School of hard knocks could be

harming kids


Children’s academic progress could be being hindered by the stark differences

between the way childcare centres, preschools and schools manage behaviour,

according to a new study from the University of Sydney.

An analysis of policy documents from 40 childcare centres, preschools and

schools in Sydney found a sharp shift from the more positive approach of gently

guiding children at childcare centres, to a system based on rules, discipline and

rewards at schools.

Children who have difficulty coping with the transition from preschool or childcare

to the school environment may have trouble establishing a rapport with their

teacher, which in turn can have long-lasting effects, says researcher Natalie

Johnston-Anderson.

“The nature and quality of the kindergarten teacher-child relationship can have

repercussions throughout a child’s schooling,” says Johnston-Anderson, who has

worked in both childcare and school sectors and who conducted the research as

part of an honours thesis.

Prior-to-school policies recognise young children are naturally explorative and will

act out in response to being ‘controlled’ by adults, she found. In contrast, most

school policies featured a ‘student welfare’ or ‘student discipline’ approach.

While 86 per cent of school policies identified using tangible rewards (such as

stickers, prizes or merit certificates), less than 10 percent of preschools in the

sample did. Just 12 per cent of childcare policies mentioned rewards, but when

they did they were all against the use of rewards.

While most childcare centres, preschools and school policies emphasised

acknowledging positive behaviour at a one-on-one level, every school policy

emphasised the public celebration of positive behaviour, but none of the childcare

policies did.

Seventy one per cent of school policies featured ordered lists of specific school

rules, while just one third of preschool policies did, and no childcare centre

policies did. And 86 per cent of school policies identified specific children’s

responsibilities, while no preschool or childcare policies did.

“Where the behavioural environment represents a gradual rather than sudden

change for children, the chance of developing positive teacher-child relationships

and hence having a successful transition is higher for all children,” Johnston-

Anderson said.


“For children already at risk, the differences between the two environments can

add an extra layer of challenge when they may already be struggling with

learning basic numeracy and literacy skills.”

While acknowledging the different staffing levels between the two sectors is partly

accountable for the different approaches, Johnston-Anderson calls for “greater

consistency between teacher training for early childhood (0-8) and primary (5-

12).”

More coordination between the sectors is also needed, she says. “Teachers in

kindergarten classrooms should understand and use the best elements of good

childcare and good preschool practice to make the transition easier for children.”

Interview requests: Kath Kenny, University of Sydney Media Office, on 02 9351

2261 or 0434 606 100. University of Sydney media after hours number 0434 609

790








news articles logo NEWS ARTICLES
Contact News Articles |Remove this article